Does Modern Word lives in chaos ?

Does Modern Word lives in chaos ?

At first I thought to name this article `` the chaos of modern word `` but I remembered that the philosophical ethics which I believe in , ought me to never put any thesis before argumentation , what makes me eliminate the first title replaced with this latter , for avoiding  the claim  that modern word is a chaos before giving a proof .

We cannot make differences between a social entity lives in chaos  and an organized one without referring to an Ideology because to be organized is to have a mental rule or an Idea persists your behaviors , That the Greek word `` Logos λόγος `` means `` to collect , to gear `` as a primary sense but it`s was used to talk about ``reason and logic``, then reason is an important condition for organization , so an organized society is a society ruling by a specific Ideology , but does modern word Ideologically ruled ?

 

The most of states in word are ruled by `` the majority rule`` what means that they had no Ideology because the Ideology is a creation of mind as an abstract substance and not a creation neither of some or many individuals nor of all individuals , it`s a creation of the mind in itself or what`s called by Fascist philosophers ``Spirit`` , that Mussolini called state `` the mind of mind `` , does any modern state claims (at least a claim) any intellectual legitimacy , looking for example to the United States as a great icon of modern democracy it`s clearly seemed at the last presidential election as a State of chaos due to the immoral accusation of the two candidates ( Trump and Clinton ) toward each other instead of having an intellectual controversy such any civilized candidates , what emphasizes Dr.Goebbels`s sentence `` Humanity would sink into an eternal darkness if the Jew win this war `` .  

 

Trump and Clinton , two faces of chaos .

 

Why should modern men follow a policy belongs to the French Revolution in the 18^th century ? with its romanticist tendency ( to live only with your instinct without abiding any rational or moral law ) , it`s true that their intellectuals emphasized the role of mind but not the mind of mind or what we called ``Spirit`` because Jacobins looked to the psychological mind as a ``God`` without looking to the mind in itself , for that the most of great German philosophers like Goethe , Hegel , Fichte ( later).. were against the political views of French revolutionists . 

 

Why should modern men follow a policy belongs to the French Revolution !

 

 

The French Revolution is based on Deism and the Romanticism of (Rousseau , Diderot..)  against religious and priest rule with Cartesian and traditional rational roots of the early modern period , then German Idealism represents really its own era and  the highest step of the intellectual and spiritual Evolution where traditional rationality is sublated with Spirituality changing the pure mind of Descart with the mind as Such or Spirit (Giest) of Germans who attempt to look it in everything , what makes everything beautiful , that Goethe said ``we must see beauty even if in stones at road `` , therefore we must look to everything as an incarnation of mind , but how mind could persist matter without any separation or disconnection ?  for that the philosopher of Fascism Sir Giovanni Gentile brings anew kind of Idealism called ``Actual Idealism`` which the Act of thinking is only real and not the Idea  itself i.e the Idea should be always present to us , so the politics is an act of thinking and an alive practice of our Ideology , that Plato argues that republic governor should be a philosopher , why we did not achieve this aim of our great philosophers since 2500 years ? why we had destroy the chance which Fascism give us in the last century ?  

Ideological Differences between Fascism and Nazism

       Fascism and Nazism are two Nationalist political  movements ,but a lot of people look to them as the same thing , whereas there are a lot of Ideological differences between these two doctrines , as well as many commun interests ; for an ultimate determination we will base on their fundamental backgrounds  .

The Duce and the Fuhrer

      Fascism is completely spiritualist based on Hegelian Idealists philosophical theories which  the primacy of Spirit (mind as an ultimate value or the mind as mind ) is emphasized , so they must look to politics only as an intellectual practice while the state is a ``wholly spiritual creation `` as the Philosopher Of Fascism Sir Giovanni Gentile says , thus Nationalism for Fascist is an aim or `` a final cause (by Scholastic term)`` , vice versa for Nazis who considered German Nationalism  as a first cause or an ideological background what imply Idealism as a Cultural feature of the Aryan race  , That the Fuhrer Adolf Hitler opposes in `` Mein Kampf`` the view who considers Nation as a goal , what makes differences also  in their theories of race .

Fascist and Nazist theories of race .

In ``Mein Kampf`` the Fuhrer Adolf Hitler argues that race is neither language nor culture at all but an issue of blood and genealogy , therefore Fascist who emphasized Idealism and stood against all forms of materialism couldn`t  accept a biological materialistic like of Hitler`s  , it`s right that  Nazis also  were anti-materialism but  by racial tendencies looking to materialism as a Jewish Ideology and not by an objective opinion , versus the other side which race is only cultural and not biological .

Conclusion

There is a circular relation between Fascism and Nazism which the start of one is the end of the other represents their opposite backgrounds and purposes , that Fascist starts by Idealism to Nationalism , while Nazism starts by Nationalism ending by Idealism .